Gary Danks Gary Danks 11th May, 2021
In this series, we debunk some of the most common myths which help convince marketers they don't have an app marketing fraud problem. 

No matter what buying metric you use (CPI, CPA, CPM, etc) to grow your users, you’ll be paying for fraudulent inventory. It’s as simple as that.

For inventory (impression, click or install) to be valid, it needs to be from a human, on the correct device and in the right location. If it isn’t all 3 of these things then it’s not valid and you shouldn’t pay for it.

 

Myth

Myth #1: App Marketing fraud doesn’t happen in my target regions

Many of our clients believed that fraud primarily affects campaigns running in Asia, Russia and the Middle East. It’s true that – fraud does often originate from these regions. However, VPNs (Virtual Private Networks), enable fraudsters to hide their real location and deliver fraudulent inventory anywhere across the world.

Due to VPNs, an install can be from a human and on the correct device, but its incorrect location can be hidden, and there will be no performance for the ad spend invested.

 

We see similar levels of fraud in Europe and North America as we do in Asia, so don’t rely on regional targeting for protection.

 

Quick tip:

In your data, look for installs happening at odd times of day for the geo area you're targeting. For example, 30 installs at 3am. This is a sign of an install farm.

 

Myth

Myth #2: My installs have great in-app performance from users, so they’re not fraudulent

This is the most common myth we hear and definitely the hardest one for marketers to digest. Unfortunately, the fact that your app installs are real and performing well, doesn't mean you should be paying for them.

It might sound counterintuitive, but this is how attribution fraud works - stealing the attribution from high performing organic installs.

 

There are a couple of methods a fraudulent supplier will use – such as, install hijacking and click stuffing – to take advantage of the touch attribution model.

 

Whatever methodology used, the end result is that marketers pay for installs they would have received anyway. Effectively, buying app installs they already own.

 

Stop attribution theft and you’ll pay a lot less in acquisition costs, but get the same in-app performance.

 

Quick tip:

A tell-tale sign of click stuffing is high click volumes vs install volumes. If you have a click to install rate (CTI) of less than 2%, that’s suspicious. It’s also worth having a quick look at publisher level CTRs, there’s usually one that sticks out like a sore thumb.

 



Myth

Myth #3: I don't spend enough on app installs to be affected by fraudulent app installs

It’s true that the big spenders - who spend millions every month on app marketing - lose the most money to fraudulent app installs.

However, in percentages, it’s actually the smaller app business that lose out the most.

 

Big-spending verticals like gaming and gambling are in most cases – though certainly not all – well aware of the problem, and use services like Machine to protect themselves.

I guarantee, if you’re buying app installs from the market and you’re unprotected from fraud - or have a simple off the shelf product - the large part of what you’re buying is fraudulent.

We’ve seen plenty of cases where some suppliers are 100 percent fraudulent.

If this sounds familiar and you’d like to have a 20-minute call to discuss your case in confidence, use this link to book a meeting.ARRANGE A CALL 
Talk to Machine in confidence about a life without fraudulent installs